Attorney General voter guide

Should Minnesota increase Attorney General staffing and criminal penalties to investigate and prosecute fraud in state-funded programs?

Should the Attorney General investigate and, where legally supported, seek consequences for state officials who knowingly ignore credible warnings of major fraud?

Should the Attorney General expand assistance to county attorneys that request help prosecuting serious violent crimes?

Should the Attorney General support court-enforced agreements requiring police departments to change their policies after findings of systemic misconduct?

Should Minnesota law allow local law enforcement to hold a person on an ICE civil detainer after that person would otherwise be released?

Should the Attorney General sue to restrict federal immigration-enforcement actions the office believes violate Minnesota’s sovereignty or residents’ constitutional rights?

Should the Attorney General defend policies limiting participation in girls’ and women’s sports to biological females?

Should the Attorney General support and defend laws that prohibit healthcare providers from prescribing puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones, or performing surgeries, for the purpose of gender transition on minors?

Should the Attorney General defend Minnesota law recognizing abortion as a fundamental right?

Should the Attorney General refuse to assist other states in investigating or penalizing abortions legally performed in Minnesota?

Should the Attorney General use consumer-protection authority to investigate pregnancy resource centers accused of making deceptive statements about abortion or the services they provide?

Should the Attorney General defend religious organizations’ ability to require employees—including some non-ministerial employees—to follow the organization’s religious beliefs?

Should the Attorney General use Minnesota consumer-protection law to sue oil companies over allegedly deceptive statements about their products’ effects on the climate?

Should the Attorney General use consumer-protection or public-nuisance laws to sue firearm manufacturers or sellers over allegedly unlawful business practices contributing to firearm violence?